Insects


A guide to Australian insect families (from CSIRO) can be found at:
http://anic.ento.csiro.au/insectfamilies/

Daley, A. & Ellingsen, K., 2012. Insects of Tasmania: An online field guide

A useful introduction to Insects, visit:
http://australianmuseum.net.au/uploads/documents/9362/invertebrate_guide.pdf

A diagram of Insect morphology illustrating terminology with legend of body parts:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insect_morphology#/media/File:Insect_anatomy_diagram.svg

A diagram of an insect illustrating terminology based on a worker ant, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaster_(insect_anatomy)#/media/File:Scheme_ant_worker_anatomy-en.svg

Photographing insects

There are two main ways to photograph insects with a camera: using a macro close-up lens or a zoom lens. If the insect tolerates your getting very close, then you can use the macro lens. For example, some moths will remain quite still when approached, believing they are camouflaged and invisible. However, many insects, especially those that can fly, will move away when you approach. This is especially true for insects like butterflies and dragonflies. So a good zoom lens is very useful for photographing many insects. If you are using a smartphone, then use a macro lens or a macro attachment. E.g. OlloClip for iPhone. If you want to have an insect identified to species then clear photographs are usually needed because minute parts of the anatomy may need to be checked. It is valuable to take several photos from various angles so that these anatomical details can be seen. Many insects are have particular plants that they feed on, and they can be identified more easily when the associated plant is known. So if the insect is resting or feeding on a plant, take note of what the plant is or ensure that a photo shows the plant clearly.

Announcements

5 May 2025

Hello NatureMaprsAs we move into the cooler months and sighting counts begin to wind down our team has been working tirelessly to ensure our platform’s usability and performance. All merch has been po...


Continue reading

Improvements to data import tool (coming soon)

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara

Platform wide attribute changes

New Feature: Moderator Quick Responses!

Discussion

DianneClarke wrote:
1 hr ago
I am pretty sure these are photos of the same moth . The first 2 were taken at the same the time - the 3rd one later when I found it dead on the sheet. As there were only a few moths that night it looks to be the same one and there was nothing else like it that I noticed visiting. To me, It doesn't look like Ardozyga haemaspila when I compare with BOLD and the ones on iNat.

Ardozyga eumela
KylieWaldon wrote:
2 hrs ago
thanks Simon. I have separated them. I never even thought that they would be different species being so close together.

Camponotus suffusus
DianneClarke wrote:
3 hrs ago
This looks like Sighting 4383309

Palimmeces pseudomorpha
PJH123 wrote:
11 hrs ago
In Hampsons, 1910 work he noted "Eublemma glaucochroa, Turner ined." (ined. (abbr.): ineditus,unpublished)
seems as though this was a mistake on his part. Making his a synonym of Turners. The AFD has this as Unplaced glaucochroa (Turner, 1902)
Sticking with AFD should this be noted as Unplaced glaucochroa

Unverified Noctuoid moth (except Arctiinae)
ibaird wrote:
Yesterday
Likewise. Pyraustinae unsucessful too.

Unverified Pyralid or Snout Moth (Pyralidae & Crambidae)
818,274 sightings of 22,357 species from 14,076 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.