I thought it was Rubus fruticosus agg. that was the catch-all name while R. anglocandicans was the commonest of the known species, as in the Blackberry Control Manual. Have things changed since I had to record cane cross-section etc before my ID was accepted? Not that I care much when removing the fruit in summer.
Technically speaking that is correct, the precedent on CNM seems to be just to use R. anglocandicans however, which is ok for now. Though it will need to change should we actually work out which species are in the ACT, I think R. anglocandicans is regarded as a synonym of another taxa overseas. Details like Cane-cross section are requried for a definitive ID.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,899,157 sightings of 21,121 species in 9,325 locations from 12,963 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.