Tiger moths (Arctiinae)

Add a sighting Subscribe View significant View unverified

Tiger moths (Arctiinae)

Moderators

MichaelMulvaney

donhe

ibaird

SuziBond

GlennCocking

DianneClarke

DiBickers

WendyEM

mcosgrove

Bron

kasiaaus

become a moderator

Announcements

Improvements to data import tool (coming soon)

28 Apr 2025

The team are working hard on a number of important improvements to the historic data import tool, to allow you to more easily bring across your historic records into NatureMapr.Thanks to support from ...

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara

Platform wide attribute changes

New Feature: Moderator Quick Responses!

New priority species lists in the ACT

Discussion

PJH123 wrote:

Yesterday

While in the Australian Faunal Directory as Oeonistis delia (Fabricius, 1787)
I believe the true name is Oeonistis altica (Linnaeus, 1768)

Unverified Tiger moth (Arctiinae)

WendyEM wrote:

2 May 2025

Oeonistis delia
https://inaturalist.ala.org.au/observations?taxon_id=868186
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/d3f46c33-c98f-4064-8d2a-ebc177c60943#names
https://www.butterflyhouse.com.au/lepidoptera/arct/delia.html

Unverified Tiger moth (Arctiinae)

donhe wrote:

25 Apr 2025

Likewise A. chromatica !!

Amata paradelpha

WendyEM wrote:

24 Apr 2025

ok, it is N. secundiana going by the isolated (black above & below) small size white spot of the hindwing visable on several shots above. However, as Don said, on ALA N. secundiana is is listed as a synonym for N. baulus see
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/e78784a4-71a6-4749-b23a-53fd838ac9a6#names

Nyctemera secundiana

WendyEM wrote:

24 Apr 2025

Yes, but where is the type specimen ? There is no indication that is a drawing of the type specimen of A. paradelpha. That British Museum specimen may be misidentified. The book the image came from is dated 1900. If I am reading this correctly Turner named A. paradelpha in 1905.

Amata paradelpha