Hmm I guess, I mean I was going off that you can't fully see the base of the plant (or is that the base?). To go further into this issue from a personal point of view I never find Centaurium ID particularly clear or convincing, there seems to be a lot of variation. For example, when going by the lack of basal rosette only, some that "seem" to be C. tenuiflorum appear to be quite similar in appearance to erythraea, but the more "typical?" that I associate with tenuiflorum (from scouring through the ones at my place and elsewhere out and about) are quite distinct when seen, as they have quite different flowers, especially the colour, e.g. Centaurium tenuiflorum (Branched Centaury) , this also features in the VicFlora key which states C. erythraea as pale pink whereas C. tenuiflorum as bright rose-pink to magenta. I've also found some C. erythraea appear to begin dying while flowering and the basal rosette can wither away (especially if it's dry), so I personally tend to also look more at the appearance of the plant, ones that are quite sturdy or large should mostly be erythraea again (Vicflora - biennial) whereas the spindly looking, smaller ones are mostly tenuiflorum (annual). This is probably only scratching the surface and perhaps not very scientific or backed up but seems to be represented throughout my personal experience with what I define as the two species when I'm out and about.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,913,073 sightings of 21,531 species from 13,372 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.