I think that's a very good suggestion, having looked at other photos online (very close match to https://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/phtml?pc=dig&pn=10171&size=3) and read the plantnet description. And for what it's worth it has a young Cassinia longifolia (or quinquefaria) on either side of it within 30 cm
It seems that in my last comment I got a bit carried away with the prospect of finding, at first glance, a fairly good match. To confuse things, the photo I referred to in the last comment is of C. arcuata not C. aculeata subsp. aculeata. C. arcuata is in some ways just as good a match and while not listed on CNM does have local sightings in the Atlas of Living Australia.
Neither seem to be a perfect match, but maybe these differences are within the natural variation within species/subspecies (?). Or perhaps it is neither species.
C. arcuata is a better match to leaf size, while C. aculeata subsp. aculeata is a better match for leaf shape and surface appearance, as summarised below.
C. arcuata has a drooping habit which my sighting doesn't exhibit at present.
Perhaps when it flowers it may help distinguish between them, so I'll be back in spring/summer.
Cassinia arcuata is a considered to be a synonym for Cassinia sifton on Canberra nature map. I did consider that when I made my inital ID, but I feel as thought that is unlikely (based on form and leaf shape).
For Cassinias in Canberra you tend to see C.longifolia and C.quinquefaria are the common species, while C.sifton and C.aculeata are more uncommon. C.aculeata is the dominant species in namadgi.
Having had another look I'm pretty confident in my ID. :)
Fair enough. A second part of my last comment refused to load earlier (CNM server is pretty slow today). I'll try again to add it, but it just summarises the aspects of the leaves that differ. I've put this location on my "check back" list for flowering time.
I think there was confusion between Cassinia arcuata and C. aculeata at some stage on CNM, possibly in conjunction with C. sifton. This could have been due to name changes. There might be some remnants of this in the sightings.
I actually used the descriptions for each species on VicFlora (https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/flora/taxon/a6465585-5699-4b95-bab7-d8ead66a05d0) to compile a table of leaf characteristics (length, width, shape, structure (e.g. "sessile"), upper surface, lower surface, margins and tips) for each of C. aculeata subsp. aculeata and C. arcuata and compared them with my sighting. But for some reason I just cannot get that (plain text) table to send as a comment.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,900,751 sightings of 21,152 species in 9,355 locations from 13,000 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.