Moths of Victoria, Part 8, on their supporting disc, give quite detailed notes on separating the Pantydia spp, they recognize; especially separating P. sparsa from P. diemeni. I quote (at page 2/5 for P. diemeni): 'While most Pantydia can be separated by examining the underside of the hindwing, most live P. diemeni can be recognized by the break in the transverse line (A).' This line is pointed to by an arrow in the supporting illustration. It is the fine white/yellow line running parallel to the trailing edge of forewing in Pantydia species. In Sighting No, 4416300 that line is entire and not broken ie. P, sparsa. In Sighting No, 4416299 that line is not entire and is broken, hence P. diemeni.
I rather presumed BOLD had checked the DNA of the specimen in that photo, before putting it in http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=70301. Can one tell from the 'bins' if that specimen is anomalous?
I'm afraid my French is not up to it. But having seen the as yet unpublished draft of 'Moths of the ACT', know the distinction I described will be borne out by the comparitive photos of the two species - although the text does not describe the difference in words.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,905,418 sightings of 21,330 species from 13,136 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.