An Ash at Mount Majura
Identification history
| Fraxinus excelsior | 19 Apr 2024 | abread111 | ||
| Fraxinus sp. | 19 Apr 2024 | Tapirlord | ||
| Unidentified | 19 Apr 2024 | waltraud |
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
User's notes
A planted tree in the nature reserve; not sure, see https://canberra.naturemapr.org/sightings/4566801
6 comments
abread111
wrote:
19 Apr 2024
using keybase HortFlora key, this is Fraxinus excelsior, European Ash, see description at https://hortflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/taxon/ada20b8c-5340-11e7-b82b-005056b0018f
Buds are black, clearly seen in 3rd photo.
Buds are black, clearly seen in 3rd photo.
waltraud
wrote:
20 Apr 2024
Yes buds are definitely blackish not brownish. So I tend to agree; it is not the very similar Desert Ash, F. angustifolia subsp angustifolia.
abread111
wrote:
20 Apr 2024
In MIS25 "Should not be planted near nature reserves"
See https://www.cityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1502874/Fraxinus-excelsior-Aurea.pdf
However there are very few records in ALA in Canberra area, so maybe it is not invasive like the desert ash, although it is said in Wikipedia to be naturalised in New Zealand.
Since it is easily identified from other ashes by the black buds, it would be good to have it listed separately in CNM and not lumped in with other species as Fraxinus sp. Then we have a chance to look at its invasiveness here.
We need to identify non-invasive exotic deciduous trees which are safe to use in urban plantings as well as the invasive ones.
Could it be added to the sleeper weeds still being sold priority list?
@MichaelMulvaney
See https://www.cityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1502874/Fraxinus-excelsior-Aurea.pdf
However there are very few records in ALA in Canberra area, so maybe it is not invasive like the desert ash, although it is said in Wikipedia to be naturalised in New Zealand.
Since it is easily identified from other ashes by the black buds, it would be good to have it listed separately in CNM and not lumped in with other species as Fraxinus sp. Then we have a chance to look at its invasiveness here.
We need to identify non-invasive exotic deciduous trees which are safe to use in urban plantings as well as the invasive ones.
Could it be added to the sleeper weeds still being sold priority list?
@MichaelMulvaney
abread111
wrote:
21 Apr 2024
The relevant TCCS tree info is
https://www.cityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1502816/Fraxinus-excelsior-Aurea-Pendula.pdf
https://www.cityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1502816/Fraxinus-excelsior-Aurea-Pendula.pdf
Tapirlord
wrote:
22 Apr 2024
This species is evidently less common than F.angustifolia so maintaining Fraxinus species on the sleeper weeds list in it's place is fine I suspect. Unless Michael feels differently, my understanding is that this particular list is for species with known invasive potential that are still commonly planted - not the case here so probably not an appropriate listing. I'll check with one of my exotic plant contacts at the Sydney herbarium and add the species If he is satisfied that the ID is correct.
waltraud
wrote:
23 Apr 2024
The tree has been planted in the nature reserve which is inappropriate independent of which Fraxinus species.
Location information
- Coordinates 149.166978-35.244350
- Altitude 635.1m
- Places Hackett, ACT
Sighting information
- 1 Abundance
- 14 Apr 2024 04:11 PM Recorded on
- waltraud Recorded by
-
Collections
Plants Other Trees waltraud
Species information
- Fraxinus sp. Scientific name
- An Ash Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Exotic
- Medium weed or pest
- Up to 794.14m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
