@Tapirlord and all – not in iNat at all ! Between 2019 and 2023 these my few sightings of this species were added by myself in to iNat – the first and only sightings in iNat – until i quit in disgust at gross abuse, by a small minority of other people there in iNat; when i stood up to that minority of abuse, then more double–downed abuse lying was piled on top of that first lot of abuse . Eventually, when, after my many attempts to seek: truth–telling about the abuse, continuing to stand up to it, including calling it out and redress; after i was accused of doing the abuse, after the ignoring of the initial abuse of me, and then blamed for the abuse of myself, by (again) a small minority of other people there, i quit and deleted all of my own 916 iNat sightings and all of my own many thousands of photographs; including all of these only _Garcinia russellii_ species sightings and their photographs (all) in iNat .
good question https://canberra.naturemapr.org/users/8081. The main weed target was A floribunda which is not on the drop down weed list of Field Maps and which I therefore mapped as Woody Weed, see Acacia floribunda (White Sally Wattle, Gossamer Wattle) Concurrently I removed some privets Nandinas and Ivy in the same area. I have problems getting accuracy to 10m or below with my old G3 / G4 mobile since G3 was discontinued; it takes ages i.e. 5 minutes or more for my mobile to get the accuracy close to 10m; I therefore use the point tool when the accuracy gets close to 10m (usually around 12m) and I have a reasonable large area to map where accuracy slightly over 10m doesn't matter. But I don't repeat that procedure for every woody weed species in the mapped area - it just takes too long - so, sometimes I just take a quick photo for a record.