Baumea articulata is popular with WQ pond designers, partly because it is a tall rhizomatous clonal evergreen macrophyte that does the job; and partly because it was used as a test species in the early research into effectiveness of planted wetlands (1990s in particular) and some of this work was done in areas where Baumea articulata occurs (Swan Coastal Plain, Adelaide area, coastal NSW and Qld).
In a perfect world, it would be nice to be able to distinguish between CNM sightings of a species that has been planted (whether terrestrial or wetland) for whatever reason (e.g. water quality, ornamental amenity on roadside), and CNM sightings of species that is radiating outwards from a planting (ie self-establishing, becoming weedy). But being consistent on this could be hard, and might be species-dependent.
Ficinia nodosa is an analogous species, in terms of its natural distribution and use in urban wetland plantings. CNM treats that as 'non-local native'. That seems to sum up Baumea articulata, as well. The category 'translocation' works OK for an actual planting but not so good if that planting starts to spread. ?
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
1,898,437 sightings of 21,107 species in 9,314 locations from 12,954 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.