Hakea decurrens subsp. decurrens

Bushy Needlewood at Lower Boro, NSW

Request use of media

Identify this sighting

Hakea decurrens subsp. decurrens Tapirlord 8 Jun 2023
Hakea sericea natureguy 8 Jun 2023
Hakea sericea JaneR 7 Jun 2023

Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

10 comments

   8 Jun 2023
Pretty sure this will be H.decurrens with the red stem colouration and particularly at that locality.
   8 Jun 2023
Good point about stem colouration for decurrens, but this doesn't seem to be a typical locality. Surveys done in and around this part of Reserve (records in ALA) give several records for H. sericea and none for H. decurrens.
   8 Jun 2023
There has been significant confusion as to seperating out these two species so I wouldn't be surprised if that has played a factor here (this is even the case for the images used by the atlas of living Australia). As I understand it H.sericea is largely coastal (and uncommonly recorded south of Sydney), while H.decurrens is the common species on the tablelands. The flora at Nadgigomar Nature Reserve is evidently a mix of both given what else you've reported, so perhaps I've corrected unnecessarily. I take it this was on a Wednesday walk?
   8 Jun 2023
Thanks guys, good discussion. Yes the two are quite similar, I see a bit of both sides here, my confirmation was perhaps a little hasty. Though I was thinking along similar lines, H. sericea could be likely in this area, compared to most of the CNM area where H. decurrens is expected.
   8 Jun 2023
The ALA info was not based on photographs but was 'human observation' by NSW govt, which presumably means it was survey (ie quadrat) data; especially given the dates were mainly 2011 or thereabouts.
And Yes, Nadgigomar Nat REs is indeed a transitional area
   8 Jun 2023
Gotcha, the vicflora key between these two isn't particuarly helpful in our case (Separation is based on floral features and the lignotuber). I'm wondering how we should resolve this. @RogerF any thoughts?
   8 Jun 2023
According to ALA which I have just looked up, decurrens is now restrictednto southern VIC and all decurrens in NSW are now sericea. Would you like to check/confirm this. Which one has the lignotuber?
   8 Jun 2023
According to PlantNet:
sericea - no lignoturber
decurrens - sometimes lignotuber.
Just for completeness, there are three subspecies for decurrens, and lignotuber is NOT used to separae them (ie "sometimes" does not correspond to lignotuber)
   8 Jun 2023
Roger,

ALA gives me a different take on relative distributions of sericea and decurrens from what you describe. My map (of records) shows no such clear separation, but instead shows a very solid overlap (virtually identical distribution) for sericea and decurrens in n-e Vic and in extreme s-e of NSW, and in NSW with decurrens extending further inland from GDR and sericea very solidly distributed from coast up and into southern ranges and tablelands.

(tried to create a QR of the map to paste in here . . . didn't work)
   9 Jun 2023
Interesting, I'll investigate further and report back.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

  • At least 1 Abundance
  • 7 Jun 2023 10:19 AM Recorded on
  • JaneR Recorded by
  • 1 metre to 5 metres Plant height

Collections

Species information

Seasonal activity

  • In flower

    J
    F
    M
    A
    M
    J
    J
    A
    S
    O
    N
    D

Record quality

Quality score 5 / 7
  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Additional attributes
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • Description
852,654 sightings of 23,812 species from 16,343 members
NatureMapr is developed by at3am | Made and hosted in Australia | privacy | CCA 3.0