My understanding from looking at BOLD photos is that G. sincerella has rusty brown forewings, each with either a wide sometimes incomplete transverse pale band, or random fragmented pale markings (sexual dimorphism?). G. phoenopis has off-white forewings, which display a rusty brown 'Y' shape when the wings are closed. I only trust BOLD. I basically do not trust ALA or iNaturalist identifications. What do you reckon?
There are a few more I think in G. phoenopis on CNM which are arguably G. sincerella, now that I am more aware of that species!. ALA relies on the peer review of others for ID. BOLD has its limitations too. The numerical taxonomy done is on a limited basis on selected specimens from collections only. Sometimes the cut-off point for numerical analysis appears somewhat arbitrary. Our task is to identify moths from life. That's difficult sometimes when BOLD only illustrates set museum specimens which are not fresh and fade and look very different from a live specimen of the same species. On the ALA and iNaturalist one sometimes also needs to take account of what the source of data is who is doing the identifying.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,199,885 sightings of 20,904 species in 9,286 locations from 12,721 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.