Plants
Other Wildflowers & Herbs
Sighting 4363739

Geranium solanderi var. solanderi

Native Geranium at Majura, ACT

Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Geranium solanderi var. solanderi at Majura, ACT - 27 Dec 2020
Request use of media

Identification history

Geranium solanderi var. solanderi 18 Sep 2022 Tapirlord
Geranium potentilloides 30 Dec 2020 Tapirlord
Geranium antrorsum 27 Dec 2020 abread111

Identify this sighting

Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

flowers pale pink, can see the mucro on the sepal tips in the close up

8 comments

waltraud wrote:
   27 Dec 2020
i tend to agree with id; just learnt today that hairs are bent backwards hence the species name...
Tapirlord wrote:
   30 Dec 2020
Geranium antrorsum has differently shaped stamen, this is geranium potentilloides. I will note for future reference that there is a conflict with Geranium antrorsum on ALA as it appears to have been renamed Geranium retrorsum. I shall do some research and see what I can do :)
waltraud wrote:
   31 Dec 2020
Many thanks for id tapirlord. According to PlantNET both species have pubescent stems with retrorse hairs; in G retrosum flowers however are usually in paris whereas in G potentiloides they are usually solitary as it seems to be the case for the specimen abread reported here.
abread111 wrote:
   31 Dec 2020
PlantNet has all three G. antrorsum (single flowers), G. retrorsum (paired flowers) and G. potentilloides with 2 subspecies. Only retrorsum seems to be common on CNM. PlantNet does not seem to make note of stamen shape. But some of the CNM photos are helpful for that. Hope your research with ALA clarifies things, Tapirlord!
Tapirlord wrote:
   31 Dec 2020
G.retrorsum also lacks hairs on the sepals which differentiates it from the other two, and while flower structure is usually a pretty good way to differentiate G.antrorsum and G.potentilloides it is worth noting that the former is mostly confined to the high country while the latter is more widespread. Currently, there are no confirmed records of G.antrorsum in the ACT outside of namadgi and surrounds while G.potentilloides has been confirmed from within the city, (although not previously from mt Majura). For future reference when submitting wildflower sightings (But specifically Geranium, drosera and whalenbergia sp) It is often easier to ID if we have a shot of the back of the flower (Although your records are usually very good abread) :). ALA seems to point to all three species names being correct on CNM. As with a little digging, I was able to uncover records of G.antrorsum in the ACT from 2017 and in NSW from 2020 so it seems as though G.antrorsum is simply under-reported due to its habitual preference. Thanks for the following up, I hope this clears up a few things, Cheers, :).
waltraud wrote:
   31 Dec 2020
Dito the Census which lists:
Geranium antrorsum, G. potentilloides var. abditum, G. potentilloides var. potentilloides and G. retrorsum.
A major difference between the 2 potentilloides var's seems the location of bracteoles.
Great descriptions / photos G. p. var. potentilloides here: https://canberra.naturemapr.org/sightings/4185798
and G. p. var. abditum here: Melobasis sp. (genus)
Barb I wonder whether you could collect a specimen and put in fridge or press for my friend botanist who 'll be back this weekend...
waltraud wrote:
   31 Dec 2020
tapirlord we had a cross over of comments; I didn't see yours when i wrote mine.
I should make a bigger effort in plant id in the future - I neglected a number of groups such as the Geranium because I found them too difficult...
abread111 wrote:
   31 Dec 2020
B Read collected sample from this clump on 31 Dec, called sample 1, at base of dead tree, in amongst dead mistletoe branches, with Glycine also very close

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Additional information

  • 10cm to 30cm Plant height
  • True In flower

Species information

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,903,523 sightings of 21,215 species in 9,380 locations from 13,060 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.