Hmmm.... I'm not convinced that the sightings 4648940 (this one), 4648928 and 4648267 are the same as the other caterpillars under Euproctis baliolalis. The are all the same as each other but different to, for instance, sighting 4619915 which seems to be typical for this species.
They do seem quite variable, but it is true that so few have been reared they could all be different species. For now it just seemed easier to lump them together until more are reared, then we can separate them out.