Scioglyptis (genus)

1 Bark Moth at O'Connor, ACT

Request use of media

Identify this sighting

Euphronarcha luxaria WendyEM 7 Sep 2026
Scioglyptis (genus) ibaird 23 May 2022
Scioglyptis (genus) donhe 23 May 2022
Scioglyptis lyciaria GlennCocking 23 May 2022
Scioglyptis loxographa ibaird 25 Mar 2022

Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

Attracted to UV light at night (50w Gecko).

9 comments

   25 Mar 2022
Female. Thread-like antennae.
   23 May 2022
I think it's a worn S. lyciaria. See photos of both females in Moths in ACT
   23 May 2022
I've looked at the photos in Moths in Act as I did originally and I'd still plump for S. loxographa female due to the shape of the forewing main line. Have you other criteria you'd point too?
   8 Sep 2026
I note that today 8/9/2026 iNaturalist's AI algorithm persists in suggesting S. loxograha as its preferred identification for this sighting,
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/425351-Scioglyptis-loxographa?photo_id=1441413
I do not see the outer hindwing pattern I would expect to see for E. luxaria.
   8 Sep 2026
and we all should believe what the machine says. Hail Big Brother.
   8 Sep 2026
Sometimes I think iNaturalist's AI is correct, sometimes not. More generally, it also depends on the question you ask!
   8 Sep 2026
I know. The trouble is that you basically have to know the answer before asking it. MOST users do not know this, so AI gets away with BS-ing them.
some extreme e.g. (human) everyone hates me so I think I should kill myself -(A.I.) You are a very intelligent person, that seems like a very good idea etc etc Let me give you some ideas for methods....
iNat AI is pretty good. I do however find it annoying being told my Victorian moth is a choice of sp. only found in U.S.A.. iNat has a much bigger data set than NM A.I. to work with. NM AI needs to be able to say I don't know instead of posting totally implausible IDs. I can see no explanation for some of the recent NM AI suggestions. It used to only hop in after a certain number of verified species was reached. If this is still happening maybe this needs to rise.
   8 Sep 2026
I also wonder if NM AI takes into account moderators changing IDs? i'e' does it reprocess if its data set changes?
   9 Sep 2026
Fair comment. I would expect AI would only take account of scientific nomenclature changes, not particular experts.
I would like iNat's AI to only give me results for Australia. Do you know whether that can be done?

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

  • 1 Abundance
  • 22 Mar 2022 10:16 PM Recorded on
  • ibaird Recorded by
  • 25mm to 50mm Animal size
  • Female Gender

Collections

Species information

  • Scioglyptis (genus) Scientific name
  • Bark Moth Common name
  • Not Sensitive
  • Local native
  • Non-invasive or negligible
  • 609.6m Recorded at altitude

Record quality

Quality score 5 / 7
  • Images or audio
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
  • More than one media file
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
853,440 sightings of 23,814 species from 16,355 members
NatureMapr is developed by at3am | Made and hosted in Australia | privacy | CCA 3.0