Broad-leaved Cumbumgi at Burra, NSW
Identification history
| Typha orientalis | 8 Nov 2019 | MichaelBedingfield | ||
| Typha sp. | 8 Nov 2019 | BettyDonWood | ||
| Typha orientalis | 8 Nov 2019 | JaneR |
Identify this sighting
Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.
User's notes
Growing in Burra Creek and also colonising cobble bar
4 comments
BettyDonWood
wrote:
8 Nov 2019
It is impossible to tell Typha orientalis and Typha domingensis apart from a photo.
JaneR
wrote:
8 Nov 2019
Useful field differences are Spike size & proportions, which are different. T. orientalis is chunkier and blunt-ended, rarely tapers. T. domingensis is narrow, and often tapers. There is a side by side photo in Sainty and Jacobs (2004) Waterplants in Australia that illustrates this.
MichaelBedingfield
wrote:
8 Nov 2019
Thanks for the clarification Jane.
I don't have that book, but I have Waterplants of NSW by the same authors. Same photo, page 214.
We have had a lot of trouble with Typha sightings, and we could review a few of them in that light.
I don't have that book, but I have Waterplants of NSW by the same authors. Same photo, page 214.
We have had a lot of trouble with Typha sightings, and we could review a few of them in that light.
JaneR
wrote:
8 Nov 2019
Ah yes, they used the photo in various editions and publications over several years.
There are other 'field' differences: leaf width (broad v narrow); leaf colour (glaucous v non-glaucous); height range (if short and flowering then T. domingensis); spike colour (duller v chestnut); habit (robust v finer); leaf habit (stiff, erect v sometimes twisted); gap between male-female infloresences (longer v smaller).
The issue (limitation) of all these is they are relative or overlapping rather than discrete and absolute, so work best when species are side by side (as at LakeBG). But the usefulness of colour and size is constrained when plants are stressed or soil conditions unusual.
The floras mention auricles but, personally, that wsa never useful in the field.
The introduced T. latifolia (not in local CNM area) is distinctive by its spike colour.
There are other 'field' differences: leaf width (broad v narrow); leaf colour (glaucous v non-glaucous); height range (if short and flowering then T. domingensis); spike colour (duller v chestnut); habit (robust v finer); leaf habit (stiff, erect v sometimes twisted); gap between male-female infloresences (longer v smaller).
The issue (limitation) of all these is they are relative or overlapping rather than discrete and absolute, so work best when species are side by side (as at LakeBG). But the usefulness of colour and size is constrained when plants are stressed or soil conditions unusual.
The floras mention auricles but, personally, that wsa never useful in the field.
The introduced T. latifolia (not in local CNM area) is distinctive by its spike colour.
Location information
- Coordinates 149.261094-35.517222
- Altitude 668.6m
- Maps Googong Foreshore
- Places Burra, NSW
Sighting information
- 4 - 15 Abundance
- 24 Mar 2019 02:28 PM Recorded on
- JaneR Recorded by
-
Collections
Illilanga flagged sightings Plants Rushes, Sedges & Mat Rushes JaneR Canberra & Southern Tablelands NatureMapr
Additional information
- 1 metre to 5 metres Plant height
Species information
- Typha orientalis Scientific name
- Broad-leaved Cumbumgi Common name
- Not Sensitive
- Local native
- Non-invasive or negligible
- Up to 1162.59m Recorded at altitude
- Machine learning
-
In flower
- External link More information
-
Ngunnawal language
Gummiuk
Record quality
- Images or audio
- More than one media file
- Verified by an expert moderator
- Nearby sighting(s) of same species
- GPS evidence of location
- Description
- Additional attributes
