It would help with confirmation if you could add field notes or clear photos showing diagnostics. http://worldwidewattle.com/imagegallery/image.php?p=0&l=d&id=23627&o=1
I"m confirming it on the basis that the features in the photo make the identification probable and presumably it was acquired for the Arboretum under this name
The species is not listed on the ACT Census of vascular plants; the planted specimen seem to be the only recorded in the ACT (the Arboretum is famous for its weeds think Callery Pear). I first thought A decurrens; I found PlantNet lists the synonym A. decurrens var. deanei, see https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Acacia~deanei
Location seems to be Southern Tablelands Ecosystems PARK (STEP) but Acacia deanei is not one of the listed species in https://www.nationalarboretum.act.gov.au/living-collections/step/list-of-species-in-step.
So it is not known from ACT, it is not listed by the Census and the only record is from a planted specimen in the Arboretum. How can you be sure that it is a local species?
Ciaran okay in principle but it doesn't help for this particular planted specimen I'd think? perhaps there is a need for collecting a specimen for id or ask STEP about this particular planting? the latter might not help though if they got the seedling from unknown source: I think bipinnate Acacia hybridize easily for instance when we ordered A dealbata for various project restoration plantings we received seedlings that had a wide range of phenotype of A dealbata and A decurrens. From my observation in the Mts Majura/ Ainslie reserves I sometimes suspect, A decurrens and A parramatensis hybridize too...