I think we should only use afd named species, and avoid unofficial taxonomic activities such as involving numbered species undescribed in peer-reviewed journals.
I think you have a point Don but it would be a pity to lose all the work that has been done on separating out a likely undescribed or just unidentified by us species, so after a lot of thought I think I would recommend that we continue at least with the ones we have already separated out.
Ok. . Is there an easy way for moderators and sighters to see a set of photos of the unofficial species that have been separated out, for comparison with a new sighting photo?