Pretty impressive @CarbonAI & @AaronClausen , there are 10 or so species in this genus locally so fantastic that it is able to ID this one already. Is it looking at all 4 photos? It wouldn’t be possible to ID without photo 4 in this case.
It's fascinating to watch what it does @Tapirlord. I notice it was only 31% certain of this suggestion too! Thanks for all your epic contributions too.