Fuscicepsana undescribed species

Murrumbateman, NSW

Fuscicepsana undescribed species at Murrumbateman, NSW - 29 Mar 2021
Fuscicepsana undescribed species at Murrumbateman, NSW - 29 Mar 2021
Fuscicepsana undescribed species at Murrumbateman, NSW - 29 Mar 2021
Fuscicepsana undescribed species at Murrumbateman, NSW - 29 Mar 2021
Request use of media

Identification history

Fuscicepsana undescribed species 12 Apr 2021 GlennCocking
Tortricinae (subfamily) 11 Apr 2021 donhe
Unidentified 8 Apr 2021 ibaird
Fuscicepsana undescribed species 2 Apr 2021 GlennCocking
Unidentified 31 Mar 2021 SimoneC

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

Couldn’t find a good match with any type of moth

10 comments

ibaird wrote:
   2 Apr 2021
The Fuscicepsana Group moths I see online all have dark banding which seems to be absent here.
GlennCocking wrote:
   2 Apr 2021
Yes, although this photo well matches ANIC specimens. I'll check the reason.
GlennCocking wrote:
   8 Apr 2021
It isn't F. fuscicepsana, but a nearby undescribed species that appears on BOLD as Conchylis sp.ANIC1
ibaird wrote:
   8 Apr 2021
Yes i see Conchylis sp. ANIC1 on BOLD which seems to match this sighting.
SimoneC wrote:
   8 Apr 2021
Thanks for the effort in tracking this one down
GlennCocking wrote:
   9 Apr 2021
Conchylis is an old invalid genus name that doesn't appear on AFD or the Checklist (except as a synonym of current names). Fuscicepsana is the correct genus.
donhe wrote:
   9 Apr 2021
In BOLD: fuscicepsana is a species, and it does not look like this.
SimoneC wrote:
   9 Apr 2021
It seems Conchylis is a synonym of Cochylis which is the valid name for the genus. However most of the Australian species that were in Conchylis seem to have moved to other genera, not always Fuscepsana. Searching ALA for Conchylis shows the list. My moth does seem to be an excellent match for the specimen on BOLD, that specimen is misnamed and should probably at be Cochylis, unless/until examination shows it to be a member of one of the other genera.
GlennCocking wrote:
   9 Apr 2021
Yes, many Torticinae were originally described in Conchylis and have since been moved to other genera (across several families). Since the species in this report hasn't been described, it doesn't formally belong to any genus, but it is placed alongside Fuscepsana fuscepsana at ANIC following studies of the Tortricinae. Conchylis isn't a valid name because it was synonymised with Cochylis, and Cochylis has only one described species, an introduced one. There isn't any indication that the species in this record is associated with Cochylis.
SimoneC wrote:
   10 Apr 2021
Fair enough, I wouldn’t argue with ANIC, not about moths anyway, and it certainly doesn’t look like any of the international Cochylis images on the internet.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Additional information

  • Grass Associated plant
  • 12mm to 25mm Animal size

Species information

  • Fuscicepsana undescribed species Scientific name
  • Common name
  • Not Sensitive
  • Local native
  • Non-invasive or negligible
  • 591.54m to 759.95m Recorded at altitude
  • Machine learning

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
1,894,840 sightings of 21,090 species in 9,306 locations from 12,939 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.