Philobota philostaura

A Concealer moth (Philobota group) at Kambah, ACT

Request use of media

Identify this sighting

Philobota philostaura ibaird 16 Dec 2019
Philobota philostaura Marthijn 16 Dec 2019

Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

Size about 14 mm. Much less contrast in the wing pattern than the one from O'Connor. A question for the moderators: should I enter repeat sightings, or only put in a sighting for a species at one location once?

3 comments

   16 Dec 2019
As far as I know there are no firm guidelines on this, except self-imposed ones. Personally, I don't usually submit repeat observations of moth species for the same site (except if doing a survey) , but I do for significantly different new locations e.g, in a reserve or different habitat, greater than about 100m away from a site or in a different Naturemapr region. This means I am ignoring posting photos of what are for me, very common moths (e.g. Olbonoma triptycha, Scopula rubraria etc.) . I do seek to re-submit the same species at a site where a different sex is apparent or when its identifiably the same species but a different form - whether recognised or not. I'm assuming we want to derive maps of distribution of species, link them to habitat if possible, but not create too large a database of repeat observations which serve no real scientific purpose. Hope this helps, but its a worthwhile set of issues to raise. However, there can also be exceptions to such rules because, for example, we might want to identify when a species is active/flowering etc. at sites at different times of the year, so observations at the same pre-defined sites over time would be actively sought (e.g. as for the orchid survey).
   16 Dec 2019
Thanks, I was trying to follow a similar set of rules, but was not clear about how much interest there would be in collecting data about seasonal trends, i.e. at what time of year a species is present.
Although this is a repeat observation, I will not remove it to leave the discussion visible (and also because there are very few sightings of this species, which you recently suggested is actually common).
   16 Dec 2019
Similar enough for me, but I may be wrong. No this species has not yet been commonly generally, but I think it will be now that its has been recognised. locally I was just referring to 2 other species that are very common at my home address and on CNM generally. iNaturalist automatically gives a month by month time series graphic plot updated for each new observation of a species for a region, but that is a feature we don.'t have on CNM.

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

  • At least 1 Abundance
  • 16 Dec 2019 09:20 AM Recorded on
  • Marthijn Recorded by
  • 12mm to 25mm Animal size

Collections

Species information

Record quality

Quality score 6 / 7
  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
  • GPS evidence of location
853,620 sightings of 23,814 species from 16,365 members
NatureMapr is developed by at3am | Made and hosted in Australia | privacy | CCA 3.0