Without mature seeds, the PlantNET key does not differentiate between these two species. I am inclined towards R. scapiger because the PlantNET description says R. plebeius has branched flowering stems and R. scapiger does not, and that I have seen R. scapiger not far from this site. My experience of R. plebeius is that it is mainly coastal. PlantNET, however, does say it gets up to 1000 m altitude.
Thanks Betty, I hope to get back in that area over summer to find these plants again this time with seeds. If you look at the photo of a herbarium sheet for R. scapiger it does show a branched flowering stem but not to the same extent as the one for R. plebeius. Although none of this probably helps as I suspect it may have been too early in the season for this plant to demonstrate whatever branching habit it may develop, but there does appear to be some development occurring in the upper stem leaf axil of image one. So at this stage you a right the PlantNET key isn't of much use and since I'd not seen (to identify) either of these species before, I looked at the CNM records where R. plebeius was more frequently recorded and the image looked closer to mine than that of the one for R. scapiger. I really need to go back when there are some mature seeds on the plant.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
2,153,789 sightings of 19,949 species in 6,493 locations from 11,438 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.